Alternative Fuels: Questions and Answers

​3. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS?

 
The major potential benefit of introducing sustainable alternative fuels in aviation is to reduce the contribution of aviation to climate change through the reduction of aviation greenhouse gas emissions.
 
Alternative fuels may also have additional environmental benefits for local air quality.
 
  • What are the benefits from alternative fuels for reducing aviation GHG emissions?

    The main benefit expected from the use of alternative fuels in aviation is the reduction of GHG emissions.
     
    If, for sustainable alternative fuels, combustion emissions are neutral and can be accounted as zero emission, this does not mean that there is no GHG emissions associated to the use of sustainable alternative fuels. The full life cycle of the fuel needs to be considered as the production of the fuel itself is likely to produce GHG emissions, including CO2 and other types of gases such as NOx or methane.
     
    The figure below provides some indicative values of the potential for emissions reductions of some biofuels compared to the case of conventional jet fuel. For conventional jet fuel, emissions associated to combustion appear in red. They are not accounted for in the case of biofuels. The indicative mean values for the different biofuels show that they have a real potential for emissions reductions, in particular for those using cellulosic feedstock.
     
     
     
    Example of biofuels potential greenhouse gas savings
     
    The variation ranges (black lines on the graph) illustrate possible variations of the life cycle emissions depending on the actual conditions for the production of the fuel (e.g. agriculture practices, fertilizers use, co-products use). It clearly illustrates the importance of carefully controlling and optimizing these conditions to achieve the minimum emissions.
     
    In addition, the results presented are for the case where no land use change (LUC) is induced by the cultivation of the feedstock. LUC has emerged as a critical parameter in the life cycle assessment of GHG emissions for the production of biofuels, as significant amounts of carbon may be stored in a given tract of land, both above and underground1. A change in land use will affect carbon storage not only through the removal of the vegetation, but also through the oxidation of the soil organic carbon induced by agricultural practices such as tillage. Yet, the change may have either a positive or negative impact: converting a forest into crop land will result in carbon release, while replacing annual crops by perennial crops may result in increased carbon storage in the land. Depending on local conditions, LUC emissions can dominate all other emissions associated with biofuels; a typical example is the clear cutting of a tropical forest to grow annual crops.
     

    Fuel life cycle and GHG emissions

     

    From the feedstock extraction or production to the final use in an engine, the fuel goes through multiple steps constituting its life cycle. At each of these steps, GHG emissions are likely to be produced. The total carbon foot print of the fuel is obtained by adding all these emissions together in a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach.

     
    For fossil fuels, in addition to combustion, emissions are associated to crude oil extraction and refining, as well as final fuel transport and distribution. In the case of biofuels, combustion emissions can be considered as neutral (see question 2), but there are emissions associated to the cultivation, harvesting, transport and conversion of the feedstock. In particular, depending on the feedstock and agricultural practices, the cultivation of the feedstock can represent a significant part of the emissions.
     
     
    Fuel life cycle emissions

     

    Thus, to assess the emissions reductions from using alternative fuels, a comprehensive accounting must be done of all emissions across all steps of the fuel’s life cycle, from the field to the tank of the aircraft. There is an environmental benefit for climate change if these emissions are lower than the emissions on the full life cycle of fossil fuels, including the combustion.

     


      
    References:
    1. Stratton & al. - Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Alternative Jet Fuels – PARTNER, Project 28 report, 2010.
    2. Prieur & al. – Life Cycle Analysis Report – SWAFEA European Study, 2011.
     
    Note:
    1. Carbon that may be stored in a land includes above ground carbon contained in the vegetation and underground carbon contained in the vegetation roots, as well as well as soil organic carbon consisting of humus, and charcoal comprising decomposed plant and animals residues, substances synthesised from the decomposition and living micro-organism and small animals.

     

  • What are the other potential environmental benefits?

Share this page: