








Due to the varied and
diverse formatting of these files, they are available for downloading in:
the original text format [Word or Wordperfect] or
in Adobe Acrobat PDF format
Updated: Dec. 20,1999
Y2K CONTINGENCY PLAN
FOR
THE MIDDLE EAST REGION
Version 1.0
August 1999
OVERVIEW
|
Introduction
|
This plan has been developed to detail contingency arrangements, which will permit the continuation of air traffic in the event of the partial or total withdrawal of air traffic services and systems during the Y2K critical period(s). This plan is to be activated during the agreed critical periods of a Y2K event. However this plan may also be used in the event that some or all air traffic service providers within the traffic flows in the MID Region lose the ability to effectively provide communications and/or surveillance services at other times. This plan aims to ensure the continuing safety of air navigation within State FIRs and to minimise effects on the travelling public. The procedures contained in this document supplement or detail, where so required, those actions and procedures prescribed in State contingency plans.
|
|
Airspace Definition
|
This contingency plan applies to traffic operating through the following FIRs: Amman, Baghdad, Bahrain, Beirut, Cairo, Damascus, Emirates, Jeddah, Kabul, Kuwait, Muscat, Sana’a, Tehran, and Tel Aviv.
|
|
Contingency Situations |
This plan addresses contingency measures for partial or total loss of the ability to provide ATS services due to Y2K induced failures of communications, navigation aids, surveillance and ancillary systems within one or more FIRs in the Middle East Region.
|
|
Activation
|
The ATS routes available for flights during the contingency period and the procedures to be followed shall be promulgated by publication of an AIP SUP by all participating States (see Annex 7 to this plan). The plan will be activated progressively in such a way as to ensure that the plan will be active in each FIR at least 2 hours before midnight local time on 31 December 1999, for the critical time events on 0000 local time and 0000 UTC on 1 January 2000 (Except for the Kabul FIR, where activation will be 1 hr 30 min prior to midnight local time). This activation shall be notified by trigger NOTAMS issued by all participating States. The planned activation time for each FIR of the MID Region is listed in Annex 1 to this plan. Any other unplanned and immediate activation of this Contingency Plan may be initiated by the affected ATS Provider via AFTN (SS priority) to adjacent FIRs and to the Regional Y2K Co-ordination Unit.
|
|
The Regional Y2K Co-ordination Unit
|
A Regional Y2K Co-ordination Unit (RY2K-CU) will be established at the Cairo Air Navigation Centre. This centre will be undertake co-ordination with National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centres (NY2K-ATMC), IATA, the RY2K-CUs of adjacent regions, and Global Y2K Co-ordination Unit. It will also assist with communications, traffic management and search and rescue as required, in the event of Y2K system failures. The role and functions of the RY2K-CU are described in Annex 8 to this plan.
|
|
Dissemination
|
The ICAO Middle East Regional Office will distribute this plan and any subsequent revisions to: States of the MID Region: Afghanistan Israel Saudi Arabia Bahrain Jordan Syria Egypt Kuwait United Arab Islamic Republic Lebanon Emirates of Iran Oman Yemen Iraq Qatar
States of Adjacent Regions (via the appropriate ICAO Regional Office): Armenia Greece Tajikistan Azerbaijan India Turkey Cyprus Libyan Arab Turkmenistan Djibouti Jamhiriya Uzbekistan Eritrea Pakistan Ethiopia Sudan
ICAO Offices: Bangkok Nairobi Montreal Paris International Organizations: Arab Civil Aviation Commission (ACAC) IATA Headquarters, Montreal IATA MID Office, Amman
|
|
Revision |
Any State wishing to propose amendments to this plan shall co-ordinate the amendments with the ICAO Middle East Regional Office and all other States which may be affected by the proposed changes. The ICAO Middle East Regional Office shall be responsible for co-ordination of any proposed amendments with ICAO Headquarters and the IATA Middle East Office.
|
|
Testing |
The facilities required for the RY2K-CU and all NY2K-ATMCs should be in place no later than 31 October 1999. Testing of communications between NY2K-ATMCs, between NY2K-ATMCs and the MID RY2K-CU, and between the MID RY2K-CU, adjacent RY2K-CUs and the GY2K-CU shall take place between 1 November 1999 and 30 November 1999.
|
|
Training |
All States shall ensure that appropriate training is provided for all staff likely to be involved in the implementation of operational procedures specified in this contingency plan, or the operation and/or maintenance on all equipment provided for Y2K contingency use. In planning for such training, States should consider:
|
National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centres
States are to establish National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centre(s) (NY2K-ATMC) to provide the following functions during the Y2K critical time period:
|
Establishment of a National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centre |
The National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centre(s) will be activated before activation of the contingency plan. Its role is:
a) to oversee the smooth implementation of the agreed Contingency Plan b) to be a point of contact with the RY2K-CU, relevant airline operations centres and the NY2K-ATMCs of adjacent States, as well as other State organisations concerned; c) to provide advice and assist in decision making to ATS operational units within the States area of responsibility; and d) co-ordinate with the RY2K-CU and adjacent States regarding deactivation, in whole or part, of the contingency plan. The NY2K-ATMC requirements for production of status reports, and the co-ordination procedures with the RY2K-CU, are described in Annex 8 to this plan.
|
|
Hours of operation of NY2K-ATMC |
The NY2K-ATMCs will operate on a 24 hour basis until such time that the contingency plan is de-activated within that State’s area of responsibility as well as along the traffic flow concerned, and co-ordination has taken place with the RY2K-CU. Facilities required for the NY2K-ATMC should remain place until 29 February 2000, to allow for possible activation of the contingency plan as a result of Y2K failure occurring at some time after 1 January 2000. |
Y2K CONTINGENCY SITUATION MANAGEMENT
|
Description of contingency situation
|
Single or multiple failures of communication, navigation or surveillance systems due to uncorrected Y2K software errors. This contingency plan assumes that, during a worst case scenario within the Y2K critical period, disruptions of air traffic services will be offset by alternate provisions of air-ground, ground-ground communication, as well as some surveillance capabilities. In areas where there is a major disruption of public services, such as landlines supporting elements of communications, navigation, or surveillance, areas of self-contained systems will continue to operate, providing localised areas of air traffic control or other services.
|
Airspace and Routes
|
Planning Principles for Contingency Routes
|
A contingency route structure has been developed for use within defined geographical areas of traffic flows. This plan requires that during the Y2K critical time period, international aircraft will flight plan using these routes so as to minimise disruption to operations, should significant degradation of en route air traffic services occur as a result of Y2K induced system failures. The routes have been developed to ensure that as far as possible, crossovers occur at or within manageable areas of airspace, where limited communication and surveillance capability may continue to exist during the Y2K critical period. In en route airspace where air-ground communications are unavailable due to Y2K related system failures, Traffic Information Broadcast by Aircraft (TIBA) procedures will apply. The procedures to be used are based on those in ICAO Annex 11, Attachment C, with some additional requirements. The Y2K TIBA procedures will be promulgated by State issued AIP Supplements. (See Annex 7 to this plan). The use of TIBA combined with the pre-activated Y2K contingency routes, should permit a safe contingency traffic management system. Additionally, if air-ground communications are disrupted, a HF flight monitoring service should be provided to aircraft on contingency routes.
|
|
Domestic Route Structure
|
ATS contingency routes which are available during the critical period for flight between aerodromes contained wholly within the boundaries of a States FIR shall be defined and promulgated by individual States in Y2K contingency plans for ATS.
|
|
International Route Structure
|
ATS contingency routes to be used during the Y2K critical period by long haul international flights to/from and transiting the Middle East region are shown on the charts in Annex 2 to this plan, and described in detail in Annex 3. Long haul flights departing from or proceeding to airports in the Middle East region which do not lie one of the contingency routes specified in this plan should plan in accordance with the requirements for domestic and inter-regional flights, as published in State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS, to or from the closest point on the appropriate contingency route.
|
|
Terminal Areas
|
Changes to terminal area procedures, such as contingency SID/STARs for use by international aircraft for arrivals or departures, shall be published as required by individual States to complement documentation provided by this plan.
|
|
Airspace Classifications
|
If control services become unavailable during the critical period, airspace classifications should remain unchanged. If circumstances necessitate re-classification of airspace within its FIR, this will be the responsibility of the State concerned. Any such re-classification should be co-ordinated with the RY2K-CU.
|
|
Charts
|
Charts depicting the contingency ATS routes should be published by individual States where significant changes to the air route structure have been made. |
Air Traffic Management
|
ATS Responsibilities
|
This section sets out the general principles for Air Traffic Management during periods of activation of the contingency plan. Specific details for each FIR are contained in the appropriate State contingency plan. For as long as all required facilities are operating normally, normal levels of ATS will be provided, within the limits of any flight planning and traffic flow restrictions as detailed in this plan. The level of ATS to be provided in the event of system failure will be as described in the State contingency plan for the airspace concerned. This may include the provision of limited flight monitoring and the provision of an alerting service, either by the State concerned or an adjacent State. In addition to co-ordination and notification as specified in State plans and letters of agreement, all such events shall be notified to the RY2K-CU.
|
|
Vertical Separation
|
Unless otherwise specified in an ATS contingency Letter of Agreement between adjoining FIRs, vertical separation shall be in accordance with ICAO Annex 2 Appendix 3.
|
|
Level Allocation: Domestic/Regional Route Structure
|
Aircraft on long haul flights to/from and transiting the Middle East Region shall be afforded priority for FL310 and above. For flight planning purposes, flights operating between airports within the Middle East region should plan on the basis that FL310 and above may not be available.
|
|
Lateral Separation |
The routes specified in the contingency plan are selected from the established route network for the traffic flows covered by this Plan. They are considered to ensure sufficient lateral separation between aircraft during the activation of the Y2K contingency plan. In the event of the loss of ground based navigational aids which may effect the navigation performance of aircraft, consideration should be given to an increase in lateral separation if required.
|
|
Longitudinal Separation and Spacing |
The longitudinal separation minimum for aircraft cruising at the same level during periods of activation of the contingency plan shall be 10 minutes, constant or increasing. In addition, all aircraft on the same route at the same level should be spaced longitudinally by a minimum of 15 minutes for traffic management purposes. This measure is to be achieved before the Y2K contingency activation time.
|
|
Crossing Tracks Separation
|
Contingency routes should be reviewed and crossing areas identified. The application of a longitudinal crossing separation minimum should be considered by the ATS Provider in the context of contingency services and co-ordinated with adjacent ATS providers where applicable. Intersecting airways that have routine traffic should be vertically separated at the flight planning stage, with preference being given to long-haul over short-haul and busy routes over less frequented routes. Normal separation minima will be available.
|
|
Reciprocal Tracks
|
Standard separation minima will apply.
|
|
Traffic Acceptance Rates
|
Manageable Y2K contingency acceptance rates for transiting and departing traffic should be calculated and co-ordinated among relevant ATS providers and airspace users. Any unanticipated loss of service that further impacts acceptance rates of airways or airports should be communicated and contingency traffic flow rates should be co-ordinated between all affected ATS Providers and communicated to aircraft operators.
|
|
Restrictions on Types of Flights
|
Priority for operations on the designated international contingency route structure will be afforded to international transport operations and such other special operations as co-ordinated between National Y2K Air Traffic Management Centres and the Regional Y2K Co-ordination Unit. Special operations may include:
State contingency plans should prioritise the use of existing restricted areas or other such airspace established around terminal areas for the purpose of traffic management during the contingency critical period.
|
Transfer of Control and Co-ordination
|
Transfer of Control
|
While all communication facilities are operating normally, transfer of control should be effected in accordance with existing letters of agreement. Procedures to be followed in the event of failure of communications systems shall be specified in State contingency plans, and associated modifications to standard letters of agreement. If unable to accomplish transfer of control, ATC should advise and ask the pilot to attempt contact with the next controlling authority and advise if contact was made. If contact cannot be made by the pilot, the estimate to the next FIR boundary should be passed on to the next available controlling authority and the pilot should be given appropriate communication instructions. Additionally, where possible, States that have more than one FIR/ACC should make arrangements, and introduce procedures for one FIR/ACC to provide back-up air-ground communication service for aircraft operating in their adjacent FIR(s) or ACC(s).
|
|
Estimate Messages
|
If ATC is unable to effect transfer of control to the adjacent ATS facility, an estimate message should be forwarded to all ATS addresses along the intended route of flight.
|
|
|
When alternative means of communication are being used, procedures should ensure that the originating controller receives a readback from the subsequent controlling authority, in order to ensure accuracy of the flight information.
|
|
Near Boundary Operations
|
Search and Rescue and other special type operations will most likely be on routings other than the Y2K contingency routes. All near boundary operations should be co-ordinated with adjacent ATC facilities. Non-essential off-airways operations (e.g. survey flights) should not be permitted during periods of activation of the contingency plan.
|
|
Co-ordination of Clearances
|
Additional time may be required for co-ordination with adjacent ATS units. State ATS Providers should review current co-ordination requirements in light of contingency operations.
|
Communications
|
Air to Ground Communications |
Frequencies to be used for control services and TIBA transmissions by international aircraft are detailed in Annex 4 to this plan and shall be published in advance of the Y2K critical period.
|
|
Ground to Ground Communications
|
Annex 5 to this plan specifies the communications systems to be used for co-ordination between ATS units in a given order of priority.
|
Search and Rescue and Emergencies
|
Responsibilities for SAR and Emergencies |
The details of arrangements for Search and Rescue in the event of an RCC being affected by Y2K related problems shall be specified in State Y2K supplementary letters of agreement.
|
|
SAR Alerting
|
The State responsible for the Search and Rescue Region (SRR) in which an emergency occurs, is normally responsible for conducting search and rescue (SAR) operations in the area. However, in the event of an emergency occurring during the Y2K changeover, which results in that State suffering an air-ground communications failure, the State concerned may be unaware of the occurrence of any emergency necessitating the initiation and conduct of SAR action. In the event that the State responsible for the SRR is unaware of this occurrence, the adjacent ACC first to know of the emergency shall declare the appropriate alerting phase and inform the State responsible for the particular SRR by the most expeditious method available. All alerting phases shall also be notified to the NY2K-ATMC of the State responsible for the SRR, the NY2K-ATMC of the State of the ATS unit declaring the phase (if different), and the RY2K-CU.
|
|
Co-operation in SAR and Emergency Situations
|
Where possible every effort should be made by States to enter into arrangements with adjacent States to assist not only in initiating SAR action but to facilitate SAR units to enter the SRR concerned, and undertake immediate search and rescue of the aircraft in the emergency condition if such agreements do not already exist). In the conduct of any SAR action in an area where the State is unable to provide meaningful communications with SAR units, mutually acceptable arrangements should be made to allow an adjacent State with the communications capabilities to maintain contact with the SAR units involved in the SAR action and to coordinate with the State responsible for the SRR.
|
|
|
The status of available airports for emergency landings and other contingencies should be readily available to ATC and aircraft operators. The use of military aerodromes should be considered for emergency use. Air carriers are to advise State ATS Providers of any military aerodromes that they wish to consider for contingency operations. In addition, States are encouraged to explore the possibilities of using military aerodromes for contingency operations.
|
|
Changes to In-flight Procedures
|
In the event of the non-availability of normal air traffic services resulting from a loss of air/ground communications, pilots should adopt the procedures detailed in section 8 of Annex 7 to this plan. These procedures are based on the ICAO Traffic Information Broadcast by Aircraft (TIBA) procedures, supplemented by the following additional items:
These procedures, collectively, are referred to as Y2K TIBA Procedures, and are to be promulgated by States as part of AIP Supplement, the standard format for which is contained in Annex 7.
|
|
Terminal Area Procedures
|
Each State shall define the specific procedures to be used in terminal contingency airspace in which international aircraft within the traffic flow area covered by this plan may operate. Terminal area contingency procedures developed for the purposes of this plan shall assume a significant level of degradation to ATS.
|
|
|
Annex 6 to this plan contains any additional information required in the Flight Plan, such as indicating that contingency routes are being adhered to, and any changes to addresses.
|
Resumption of Normal Services
|
Staged Recovery Procedures |
The resumption of normal services will be managed by a staged recovery from contingency conditions. Once the required facilities are available, each state will be able to resume provision of normal services within its own airspace. However the de-activation of the contingency arrangements in relation to routes, level restrictions, traffic flow measures etc., will require consideration of the situation within a whole traffic flow. This de-activation process will be co-ordinated by the RY2K-CU. Stage 1 Immediately after each Y2K critical time period (midnight local and UTC), ATC facilities (ACCs, Approach Controls, Towers, etc.) must determine the status of their air traffic service capabilities. Unmonitored systems should be manually checked after each critical time period has passed. Communication line checks should be performed with all adjacent facilities and radio checks performed with all aircraft within their area of responsibility. Radio checks should be done in an orderly fashion initiated by ATC. Stage 2 ATC facilities will report all Y2K related equipment outages to their NY2K-ATMC. It is important that the exact nature of the outage be described if known and the consequences of the outage. If possible, an estimated time to restoration should be given on any operational system that is out of service. In addition, NOTAMs should be issued for any loss of service or facilities. Stage 3 After the passing of each critical time period (midnight local and UTC), the NY2K–ATMCs will prepare a status report of all Y2K related equipment outages and their impact on air traffic service capabilities within their area of responsibility. This status report should follow a common file format promulgated by ICAO and/or the RY2K-CU. Stage 4 After the passing of each critical time period (midnight local and UTC), the NY2K-ATMCs will transmit their status reports of equipment and service capabilities to the RY2K-CU in the common file format, if possible. In addition, updates of restoration of services or additional Y2K related outages should be immediately sent to the RY2K-CU. Stage 5 The RY2K-CU will prepare and disseminate a regional status report with pertinent NY2K-ATMCs, airline operation centres, and adjacent RY2K-CUs. Stage 6 The RY2K-CU will facilitate co-ordination among the NY2K-ATMCs within the MID Region and the RY2K-CUs from adjacent regions to determine a mutually acceptable time to deactivate the Regional Y2K Contingency Plan, either in part by traffic flow, or complete regional de-activation. Stage 7 NOTAMs will be issued by State ATS Providers specifying the time to changeover from contingency to normal procedures. Stage 8 Normal services resume.
|
Annexes
|
Annex 1 |
Activation times |
|
|
Chart of Contingency Routes |
|
Annex 3 |
International Route Structure |
|
Annex 4 |
Frequencies to be used – International |
|
Annex 5 |
CNS systems Failure Contingency Planning |
|
Annex 6 |
Flight Planning Requirements |
|
Annex 7 |
Common AIP SUP for activation of the contingency plan |
|
Annex 8 |
The Regional Y2K Co-ordination Unit |
ANNEX 1
Y2K Contingency Plan Activation Times
|
FIR |
Time Difference to UTC |
Activation Time (UTC) |
|
Amman |
+2.00 |
1800 |
|
Baghdad |
+3.00 |
1800 |
|
Bahrain |
+3.00 |
1800 |
|
Beirut |
+2.00 |
1800 |
|
Cairo |
+2.00 |
1800 |
|
Damascus |
+2.00 |
1800 |
|
Emirates |
+4.00 |
1800 |
|
Jeddah |
+3.00 |
1800 |
|
Kabul |
+4.30 |
1800 |
|
Kuwait |
+3.00 |
1800 |
|
Muscat |
+4.00 |
1800 |
|
Sana’a |
+3.00 |
1800 |
|
Tehran |
+3.30 |
1800 |
|
Tel Aviv |
+2.00 |
1800 |
ANNEX 2
Charts of Contingency Routes
The following charts show the Y2K contingency routes for international flights transiting the Middle East region. All such aircraft must plan in accordance with these routes for flights during periods of activation of the contingency plan.
Separate charts are presented for:
Aircraft to/from and transiting the Middle East Region shall be afforded priority for FL310 and above.
A detailed description of the routes, together with additional level restrictions applying to specific routes, can be found in Annex 3 to this plan.
For flight planning purposes, flights operating between airports within the Middle East Region should plan on the basis that FL310 and above may not be available.
ANNEX 3
MID Region Contingency ATS Routes for International Overflights
Notes: 1. This table contains the routes to be flight planned by long haul international flights to/from or transiting the MID region during periods of activation of the Y2K contingency plan.
2. Details of routes available for domestic and intra-regional flights, and any restrictions (including levels) applying to the use of these routes, shall be published by States in the AIP Supplements implementing this contingency plan.
3. Long haul flights departing from or proceeding to airports in the Middle East Region which do not lie on one of the contingency routes specified in this plan, should plan in accordance with the requirements for domestic and inter-regional flights (as per Note 2 above) to or from the closest point on the appropriate contingency route.
4. Level restrictions have been applied to some routes, to ensure that where routes converge or cross, aircraft on converging tracks will not be at the same level. These level restrictions are shown in the remarks column.
|
Traffic Flow |
Route |
Remarks |
|
1. Westbound traffic flows |
||
|
Asia to Europe via DERA ISMAIL KHAN |
a) DERA ISMAIL KHAN-V876-JALAL-MATAL-ANWAR-GARRI or b) DERA ISMAIL KHAN-V876-JALAL-MATAL-V878-RAMAN or c) DERA ISMAIL KHAN-V876-JALAL-PYANDZH |
|
|
Asia to Europe via TIGER |
TIGER-ZHOB-V838-AFGAN-BAKU |
|
|
Asia to Europe via A1/B210 TASOP |
a) TASOP-B210-CHOR-NAWABSHAH-B466-GASIR-G452-ZAHEDAN-G208-ANARAK-TEHRAN-R660-RASHT-TABRIZ-EZERUM or b) TASOP-B210-CHOR-NAWABSHAH-B466-GASIR-G452-ZAHEDAN-G208-ANARAK-TEHRAN-W12-NOSHAHR-R794-ULDUZ-B143G-BAKU |
b) FL280 or below |
|
Asia to Europe via R648 and MUMBAI |
MUMBAI-R328W-SUGID-BILAT-R328-SAPNA-KARACHI-G208W-PARET-PANJGUR-R654-NABOD-KERMAN-YAZD-ESFAHAN-SAVEH-ZANJAN-G208-UROMIYEH-VG8-SIIRT-ELAZIG |
|
|
Asia to Europe via B466 BELGAUM |
BELGAUM-B457-KIBIT-UN569-ETUKO-LOTOS-UL300-KURAL-DAFINAH-UL573-MADINAH-WEJH-A411-SHARM EL SHEIKH-R650-TABA-EL ARISH-G183-PASOS-KAROL-APLON-RODOS |
FL350 only
|
|
Asia to Europe via TRIVANDRUM |
a) TRIVANDRUM-G462-ALAMA-IZKI-G462-ABU DHABI-PIMAL-B418-KING FAHAD-R219-PATOT-DCT AL JOUF-TURAIF-R785-KARIATAIN-BANIAS-NIKAS-VESAR-MUT or b) TRIVANDRUM-G462-ALAMA-GEVAR-UN569-ETUKO-LOTOS-UL300-KURAL-DAFINAH-UL573-MADINAH-WEJH-A411-SHARM EL SHEIKH-R650-TABA-EL ARISH-G183-PASOS-KAROL-APLON-RODOS or c) TRIVANDRUM-UL425-DONSA-HAIMA-RAMIL-SULAYEL-BISHA-AL BAHA-MALIK-JEDDAH-R775-LUXOR-A451-ASYUT-KATAB-B12-EL DABA-SITIA |
a) FL390 only
b) FL310/390 only
c) FL 350 only if proceeding beyond Jeddah |
|
Eastern and Southern Africa to Europe via HARGEISA |
HARGEISA-DCT TORBA-R777-TAIZ-B413-HODEIDAH-DANAK-R775-JEDDAH- R775-LUXOR-A451-ASYUT-KATAB-B12-EL DABA-SITIA |
FL390 only |
|
India to Eastern Africa |
MUMBAI-A451-ANGAL-ODAKA-ADEN-B535-DJIBOUTI |
FL260 only |
|
Gulf to Africa |
a) HAIMA-B400-MARMUL-B535-SALALAH-RIYAN-ADEN-G651-HARGEISA or b) HAIMA-B400-MARMUL-BOSKI-ODAKA-ALULA |
a)FL310 only
b) FL350 only Note: For details from departure AD to Haima, see State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS. |
|
Gulf to Iran and Eastern Europe |
SHARJAH-A418-PAPAR-SHIRAZ-R659-ESFAHAN-TEHRAN-R660-RASHT-G670-LALDA-BAKU |
F280 only |
|
Pakistan to Gulf |
KARACHI-G787W-PARET-SIDKA-G787-SEEB |
FL260 only Note: See State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details to destination AD. |
|
Mumbai to Gulf |
MUMBAI-R219W-SUGID-MAROB-B415-SEEB |
FL310 only Note: See State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details to destination AD. |
|
Maldives to Gulf |
MALE-R456-DONSA-DCT ALAMA-B416-SUR-IZKI-G462-ABU DHABI-PIMAL-B418-KING FAHD |
FL280 only Note: See State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details to destination AD. |
|
Southern India and Pakistan to Eastern Europe |
TASOP-B210-CHOR-NAWABSHAH-B466-GASIR-G452-ZAHEDAN-G775-BIRJAND-MASHAD-ASHGABAT |
FL 280 or below if proceeding beyond Ashgabat |
|
2. Eastbound traffic flows |
||
|
Europe to Asia via PYANDZH V848 |
PYANDZH-V848-JALAL-V876-LAJAK-BANNU-DERA ISMAIL KHAN |
FL370 only |
|
Europe to Asia via AFGAN V838 |
BAKU-AFGAN-V838-ZHOB-TIGER-NEW DELHI |
FL370 not to be flight planned |
|
Europe to Asia via ERZURUM |
ERZURUM-R660-TABRIZ-RASHT-TEHRAN-G208-ANARAK-ZAHEDAN-G452-GASIR-B466-NAWABSHAH-B210-CHOR-TASOP |
|
|
Europe to Asia via ELAZIG |
ELAZIG-VG8-SIIRT-UROMIYEH-G208-ZANJAN-R654-SAVEH-ESFAHAN-YAZD-KERMAN-NABOD-PANJGUR-G208E-DOSTI-KARACHI |
|
|
Europe to Asia via MUT |
MUT-B15-VESAR-UL619-NIKAS-R785-BANIAS-KARIATAIN-TURAIF-DCT TOTAD-R219-PATOT-RATUN-SHARJAH-MERMO-MAROB-MUMBAI |
|
|
Europe to Asia via RODOS |
RODOS-UG18-APLON-UG183-KAROL-PASOS-EL ARISH-TABA-A411-NUWEIBA-SHARM EL SHEIKH-PASAM-WEJH-B418-MADINAH-DAFINAH-KURAL-UL300-LOTOS-UN569-ETUKO-KIBIT-B457-BELGAUM |
|
|
Europe to Asia via SITIA |
SITIA-UL607-EL DABA-B12-KATAB-A451-ASYUT-LUXOR-R775-JEDDAH-UL425-MALIK-AL BAHA-BISHA-SULAYEL-HAIMA-DONSA-TRIVANDRUM |
FL370/FL410 only |
|
Europe to Southern and Eastern Africa via SITIA |
SITIA-UL607-EL DABA-B12-KATAB-A451-ASYUT-LUXOR-R775-JEDDAH -DANAK-B413-HODEIDAH-TAIZ-R777-TORBA-DCT HARGEISA |
FL370/FL410 only |
|
Eastern Europe to South Asia via BAKU |
BAKU-B143G-ULDUZ-R794-NOSHAHR-W12-TEHRAN- G208-ANARAK-ZAHEDAN-G452-GASIR-B466-NAWABSHAH-B210-CHOR-TASOP |
Not above FL290 |
|
Eastern Europe to Pakistan and Southern India via ASHGABAT |
AHSGABAT-G775-MASHAD-ZAHEDAN-BIRJAND-G775-ZAHEDAN-G452-GASIR-B466-NAWABSHAH-B210-CHOR-TASOP |
Not above FL290 |
|
Eastern Europe to Gulf |
BAKU-B143G-ULDUZ-R794-NOSHAHR-W12-TEHRAN-R659-ESFAHAN-SHIRAZ-A418-PAPAR-SHARJAH |
Note: See State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details to destination AD. |
|
Gulf to Pakistan |
SEEB-G787-SIDKA-G787E-LATEM-KARACHI |
FL270 only |
|
Gulf to Maldives |
ALAMA-DCT-DONSA-R456-MALE |
FL290 only Note: see State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details from dep AD to ALAMA |
|
Africa to Gulf |
a) HARGEISA-G651-ADEN-B535-RIYAN-SALALAH-MARMUL-B400-HAIMA or b) ALULA-B400-ODAKA-BOSKI-MARMUL-HAIMA |
Note: See State AIP SUPS and NOTAMS for details from HAIMA to destination AD. |
|
Eastern Africa to India |
DJIBOUTI-B535-ADEN-A451-ODAKA-ANGAL-MUMBAI |
FL270 only |
Annex 4
Frequencies to be used
1. VHF Y2K TIBA Frequencies 128.950 MHz
2. High Frequency (HF) Aeronautical Mobile Service (AMS)
|
Network |
Frequency (kHz) |
Station |
Remarks
|
|
MWARA |
|
|
|
|
MID 1 |
2992 5667 8918 13312 |
Aden Bahrain Jeddah Ryian Sana’a Tehran
|
Jeddah also has 11300 |
|
MID 2 |
3467 5658 10018 13288
|
Kabul Tehran Muscat |
Muscat when required |
|
AFI 3 |
3467 5517 5658 11300 13288 17961 7595 6625 |
Aden Cairo Jeddah Ryian Sana"a |
Frequencies 7595 kHz and 6625 kHz are RDARA frequencies |