Title

A7) Discrepancies between Item 18 in FPL and ATS messages

Assigned To

SSILVA

Issue Status

Resolved

Priority

(2) Normal

Description

A-7) Discrepancies exist between the Item 18 TYP/ data shown for the Flight Plan and that shown for ATS messages. The meeting sought clarification in respect to the use or non-use of commas between aircraft types, noting that the Flight Plan (page 16 of Amendment 1) indicates that
 
TYP/ Type(s) of aircraft, preceded if necessary without a space by number(s) of aircraft and separated
by one space, if ZZZZ is inserted in Item 9.
Example: TYP/2F15 5F5 3B2

whereas, the ATS message (page 30 of Amendment 1) includes commas between aircraft types, as shown below:
 
TYP/ Type(s) of aircraft, preceded if necessary without a space by number(s) of aircraft and separated
by one space, if ZZZZ is inserted in Item 9.
Example: –TYP/2F15, 5F5, 3B2
 

 

Category

(2) Category2

Due Date

 

Related Issues

 

Comments

The comments are accepted and in the published version the comas from Field Type 18, TYP/ on page 30 will be removed.

Attachments

Created at 05/11/2013 1:38 PM by Hu, Susan
Last modified at 05/11/2013 2:54 PM by Hu, Susan